by Dr.Harald Wiesendanger– Klartext
What the mainstream media is hiding
SARS-CoV-2 was not an isolated case: At least 16 pathogens escaped from research laboratories between 2000 and 2021, as a new study shows. A large part came from gain-of-function experiments that were intended to make pathogens even more contagious and more deadly. Instead of immediately putting an end to this diabolical perversion of science, governments, militaries, and secret services are unscrupulously promoting it. And the media is silent; the population is asleep. While she is frightened by “man-made climate change,” the man-made bio-apocalypse could befall her tomorrow – with the Corona pandemic as a comparatively harmless prelude.
Not a bat, but a bio laboratory in Wuhan brought the Covid-19 pathogen into the world. Anyone who cared to look found solid evidence of this just a few weeks after the epidemic officially broke out; I presented them in my book Corona Riddles, published in June 2020, which promptly fell victim to censorship on social media; Amazon blocked it from its range. What was hidden from the public at the time is now revealed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his documentary thriller The Wuhan Cover-Up.
But the Wuhan lab leak was far from the only one, as a new study just published in The Lancet Microbe makes clear. In peer-reviewed articles and online reports published between 2000 and 2021, the international team of authors found evidence of 16 cases in which a pathogen had escaped from a laboratory.
In addition, researchers found 309 cases of infections that were classified as “laboratory acquired.” Bacteria caused 77% of it, viruses 13.9%, parasites 7.1%, fungi 1.6%, and prions (1) have less than 1%. Eight cases were fatal; Six of these involved bacteria such as Yersinia pestis, the plague pathogen, or Neisseria meningitidis – they cause purulent meningitis and, more rarely, blood poisoning. Once again, the Ebola virus was the trigger.
I describe the most shocking examples of breakdowns in supposed “high security” laboratories in Corona Riddles. (Chapter 15: “The clock is ticking”)
– This included an outbreak of swine flu, which had been eradicated since 1957, from Fort Dix in New Jersey in 1976.
– The human H1N1 virus that spread in Russia and China the following year also came from the laboratory.
– In 1979, a leak at an anthrax production plant in Sverdlovsk, USSR, claimed around 60 lives.
– In 1995, after a laboratory escape, the pathogen causing Venezuelan equine encephalitis infected 85,000 people in Venezuela and Colombia, killing 300, harming 3,000, and causing 10 miscarriages.
– A SARS virus escaped from a military research facility in Taiwan in 2003.
– And there is strong evidence that the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa also originated from a nearby BSL4 laboratory. (For more information, see KLARTEXT “Covered up: Ebola also comes from the laboratory.”)
– In 2019, a biopharmaceutical plant in Lanzhou, China, leaked the brucellosis pathogen, which causes fever and muscle pain that can last for weeks and years; more than 10,000 people became infected.
– Monkeypox, which suddenly became rampant in 2022, is suspected to be the same, with 16,000 cases registered in 75 countries.
This makes two common myths unnecessary: pathogens rarely escape from laboratories. Most pandemics are still zoonotic, i.e., when a pathogen spreads naturally from animals to people. Why do pandemics only occur in a strangely frequent manner and at ever shorter intervals since more and more high-security biological laboratories have been in operation? There are said to be 60 worldwide, not counting secret systems.
Just “the tip of the iceberg.”
All known cases represent “just the tip of the iceberg,” as the scientists suspect. On the one hand, there are no standardized reporting regulations. On the other hand, the laboratories and their clients are usually keen to cover up security mishaps as much as possible. The incentive for this is high: there is a risk of losses in investments and high expenditure for stricter security precautions or, in the worst case, the laboratory being closed.
The infections identified largely resulted from “procedural errors”: biosecurity or risk reduction regulations were violated, e.g., B. by using the wrong protective equipment, inadequate training, or improper handling of samples. The remaining infections occurred through needle stick injuries, spills, splashes, open bottles, animal bites, expired disinfectants, and cleaning products or for “unknown reasons.”
What lies behind such incidents is obvious to bioweapons expert Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois. Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act in the US in 1989, explained to the online magazine The Defender: “More generally, these leaks indicate that the laboratories involved are involved in the research, development, testing, and storage of biological weapons of attack and therefore violate international agreements.” They provide pathogens with a “gain of function” – in other words, they make them even more dangerous to humanity than they already are.
Health authorities tend to downplay the risks associated with gain-of-function research. It is said that it is about modifying potential pandemic triggers in order to then develop vaccines against them.
Boyle recognizes this as the “standard propaganda of these death researchers. We all know that ‘gain-of-function’ is a euphemism for biological attack weapons like Covid-19.” The whole framework of their argument is misleading, says Boyle, because “they used gain-of-function to be the biological attack weapon to develop them in the first place, and then reverse engineer them to create a ‘vaccine’ in case of a boomerang.”
The medical historian Dr. Martin Furmanski sees this as a “self-fulfilling prophecy,” with laboratories supposedly working with pathogens to prevent the very outbreaks they ultimately cause.
The US physician Prof. Paul R. Goddard speaks of “MAD research.” The acronym stands for Make Another Disease.
Like crazy
It doesn’t take an exuberant imagination to vividly imagine the crazy risk this poses. In March 2021, while the horror of the corona pandemic gripped the world, an 18-person research team from the University of Siena celebrated the most insane breakthrough of the year: In the laboratory, they created a new, even more dangerous coronavirus from SARS-CoV-2. It evades the antibodies that our immune system produces in response to an infection. This makes it extremely deadly. (For more information, see KLARTEXT “Hurray, SARS-CoV-3 is here!“)
And Chinese scientists have just reported another example of perverse cutting-edge research – on mice that they had genetically modified so that their lungs were more similar to human ones. Using a mutated coronavirus, they achieved a 100% kill rate in these laboratory animals. The autopsy found high amounts of viral RNA in various organs, including the lungs and eyes – most of it in the brain.
Who is left unmoved by the prospect that such outgrowths of suicidal madness could soon descend on humanity just as quickly as the Covid-19 pathogen did recently? Who doesn’t want to do everything they can to prevent this? I can only think of three possible beneficiaries: the manufacturers of antidotes. Their owners. As well as everyone who thinks they can get closer to their vision of a brave new world by “protecting” a frightened population through total control.
From Pandemic to Plandemic
Brilliant deals with the recent pandemic have made another one soon even more likely. By 2027, global sales of corona vaccines will amount to 348 billion euros, as predicted by IQVIA, a leading information service provider in the healthcare industry; Covid-19 therapeutics such as Paxlovid will cost a further 110 billion euros by then. Altogether, almost half a trillion euros: Doesn’t such friction make any crime tempting? Why should corporations that are notorious for overkill twiddling their thumbs wait until the next highly contagious pathogen accidentally escapes from some research facility? Helping with the release would be child’s play with money and connections. All it takes is one corrupt laboratory technician.
“Close all these labs immediately!”
For Boyle, one thing is certain: all high-security biological laboratories worldwide “must be closed immediately before another pandemic occurs.”
Isn’t it hair-tearing? In March 2011, on a Pacific island that has constantly been threatened by earthquakes and tsunamis, a nuclear meltdown occurred in a nuclear power plant of a known unsafe type – and promptly, 8,750 km further west, the panicked government decided to create a republic that was both tsunami- and earthquake-proof to get out of nuclear energy (in order to then obtain nuclear power from immediate neighbors). The global catastrophe that began in Wuhan, on the other hand, has not yet triggered any political initiatives in the same republic to finally get to the root of the impending evil.
The Fukushima disaster caused an estimated 18,500 deaths, and that of Chernobyl around 4,000. In the case of a killer virus released accidentally or intentionally, however, the number could be billions. Chernobyl’s “death zone” extends over a radius of about 30 kilometers around the destroyed reactor. SARS-CoV-X or some other diabolical biotech construct, on the other hand, could make the entire planet uninhabitable – or turn it into an inhumane hygiene dictatorship from which there is no escape. Who cares about a “carbon footprint” and the like?
(Harald Wiesendanger)
Remarks
1 Prions are degenerated proteins that can cause diseases in humans and animals. Unlike viruses, bacteria, or fungi, they have no DNA or RNA. They do not reproduce by dividing but by inducing changes in neighboring molecules.
Cover photo: Freepik
Editors note :
The WEF and Gates are doing it again, and they’re not even hiding it
Researchers in China have discovered a strain of coronavirus that caused 100% mortality due to a “late-stage brain infection.” It also turns your eyes white before you succumb to fever and flu-like a zombie. Great! Is this the Disease X that the Davos crowd is going to discuss this week at the World Economic Forum? This IS gain of function research, and it is extremely dangerous. Time to stop it yet?