by Dr.Harald Wiesendanger– Klartext
What the mainstream media is hiding
If aliens have really been circling the blue planet for a long time, why don’t they finally land? They are indeed afraid of being infected with a brain virus that seems to be driving them insane: surrendering to a health system that thrives on illness.
The ancient Egyptians, Romans, Aztecs, and Mayans have marveled at the odd UFO. But strangely enough, these nimble things have only been swarming in the sky in large numbers since the second half of the last century – just as the terrestrial health crisis began, turning more and more people on Earth into chronically ill people. Can this timing be a coincidence? Earth was certainly included in the UWHTA (Universal Worm Hole Travel Agency) travel catalog at the time – as the main attraction of intergalactic long-distance tourism because it is probably the only inhabited planet in the universe whose inhabitants (a) occasionally show signs of intelligence, but (b) have apparently been pursuing a health-destroying program for decades, in which they (c) undeterredly recognize scientific and technological progress.
But why don’t curious extraterrestrials land here in droves for sightseeing and handshakes? Why do they continue to buzz around above our heads at a safe distance, only to flee again after a short while at almost the speed of light? Presumably, because the ET tourists fear they could become infected with the brain virus that our unspeakable medical system has produced and maintains: a monstrous machine that works better the worse we do it – the more we lose what we consider to be our greatest asset.
This medicine has made such enormous progress that in its strongholds, western industrialized countries, one in two people is now chronically ill – and the trend is rising. 20 to 30 percent already suffer from several diseases at the same time. (1) And the older you get, the more frequent and worse it is: In Germany, for example, 76 percent of women and 68 percent of men in the 65 to 74 age group have two or more chronic diseases at the same time. From the age of 75, the proportion rises to 82 percent for women and 74 percent for men. (2) In the age group of 65 to 74, one in four women and one in five men have five or more chronic diseases at the same time; from the age of 75, 35 percent of women and 26 percent of men are affected.
The more multimorbid people there are, the more frequent visits to the doctor (3) and hospital stays become. The more often the doctor is overwhelmed – because one patient with several diagnoses is not the same as several patients each with one. The diseases often influence each other. The same applies to treatments. And the more illnesses occur, the more prescriptions and referrals are issued. (4) The more costs are incurred. (5) The more often polypharmacy, the simultaneous use of several drugs, causes uncontrolled, dangerous side effects beyond those that each individual drug already brings with it. One drug can strengthen or weaken the effects of others. New effects can occur that none of the drugs would have had if they had been used individually. As a rule, the psychological burden also increases with multi-medication.
Spaceship Earth is about to turn into a military hospital. Most of the passengers are already inside; the rest are apparently about to leave. Where is the general outcry of sheer horror at such horrific conditions and prospects? Why have there not been mass protests from New York to Tokyo, from London to Sydney – against an obviously misguided health policy, against a lack of information, against inadequate protection against everything that makes us and our loved ones sick? If students all over the world skip class to take to the streets for climate protection on “Fridays for Future,” – shouldn’t they then organize entire “Weeks for Future” as soon as possible for the sake of their own health protection? And where is the outrage of their parents about the medical future that awaits their children? Why are the lambs silent? They allow themselves to be distracted, lulled, and deceived. They find it annoying to take responsibility. They fail to ask the right questions – for example, about the real causes of the global health emergency.
The truth is simple
“The truth is simple,” Buddha taught. He wasn’t really thinking about the modern healthcare system, but he would have been spot on here, too. The simple truth is that there is no money to be made from healthy people. And neither from dead people. The ones in between are lucrative: the chronically ill. Business with them is better the more there are. The earlier they become sick. The longer they stay ill. The more medical goods and services they consume in the process. What is detrimental to business: knowledge of the actual benefits of these goods, the true extent of their side effects and risks, effective prevention, and proven, inexpensive treatment alternatives.
What logical conclusions follow from all this about the true, ultimate goal of the earthly health economy? About authorities that let them do what they want? About politicians who don’t change anything? About voters who vote for such politicians? About media that remain silent? About doctors who provide assistance? And about patients who play along?
Under such circumstances, no one can blame ET for wanting to avoid close encounters with Homo insapiens as much as possible – and preferring to satisfy his curiosity at a safe distance from a floating UFO.
(Harald Wiesendanger)
Excerpts from Harald Wiesendanger: The health system – How we see through it, survive and transform it (2019), pp. 7, 9, 38 and 42-45.
Auszüge aus Harald Wiesendanger: Das Gesundheitsunwesen – Wie wir es durchschauen, überleben und verwandeln (2019), S. 7, 9, 38 und 42-45.
Notes
1 „Multimorbidität: Wenn Krankheiten interagieren“, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 114 (20) 2017, A-998/B-830/C-812, https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/188825/Multimorbiditaet-Wenn-Krankheiten-interagieren
2 J. Fuchs u.a.: “Prevalence and patterns of morbidity among adults in Germany. Results of the German telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 “. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 55(4) 2012, S. 576-586, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00103-012-1464-9.
3 A. Hessel u.a.: „Inanspruchnahme medizinischer Leistungen und Medikamenteneinnahme bei über 60-Jährigen in Deutschland – gesundheitliche, sozialstrukturelle, soziodemographische und subjektive Faktoren.“ Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 33/2000, S. 89–99; G. Laux u.a.: „Co- and multimorbidity patterns in primary care based on episodes of care: results from the German CONTENT project“,BMC Health Services Research 8/2008, S. 14–21.
4 T. Kühlein u.a.: „Kontinuierliche Morbiditätsregistrierung in der Hausarztpraxis. Vom Beratungsanlass zum Beratungsergebnis“, München 2008.
5 G. Anderson u.a.: “The growing burden of chronic disease in America “, Public Health Report 119/2004, S. 263–270, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/reader/10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.005