by Dr.Harald Wiesendanger– Klartext
What the mainstream media is hiding
Less than two days after multiple vaccinations, Sawyer stopped breathing forever. He’s two months old then. His blood contains 95 micrograms of aluminum per liter – a level that would be toxic even to adults. A toxicologist confirms that this heavy metal contamination can only come from the vaccines. Nobody knows precisely how often such “sudden infant deaths” (SIDS) occur. A criminal silence cartel made up of doctors, forensic experts, authorities, the pharmaceutical industry, scientists, and the media ensures that the main cause is covered up, parents remain unaware – and those responsible go unpunished.
On October 20, 2022, Melissa and Nick, a young couple from the US state of Maine, took their little Sawyer, just 54 days old, to the pediatrician because of a stubborn rash on his upper body. He diagnoses a viral infection and prescribes Baby Tylenol, a medical cream. (1)
A week later, the recommended multiple vaccinations are due against rotaviruses, Haemophilus influenza B, 13 types of pneumococcal bacteria, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, and polio. The mother, a nurse, expresses reservations because the rash is still there. But the doctor insists on injecting as planned.
Immediately after the “spikes,” Sawyer begins to scream heartbreakingly – unquenchable. It wasn’t until the next day that he calmed down a little. The baby falls asleep around 6:15 p.m. When Melissa checks on him four hours later, he is not moving and is no longer breathing. Horrified, she lifts his limp, lifeless body from the crib and begins to scream. Nick rushes over and immediately picks up the phone.
A paramedic who was called tried to revive the child – in vain.
Because it involves a dead infant, an official investigation is taking place. The police looked for evidence of child abuse and alcoholism but quickly concluded that it was probably an accident.
On the day of Sawyer’s death, the chief medical examiner conducted an autopsy. He notes that Sawyer was “well developed” and showed no signs of injury or bruising. He then writes on the death certificate that Sawyer suffocated due to a “suboptimal sleep environment” – essentially blaming his parents. How does he come up with that?
Melissa and Nick won’t let that go. You start researching on the internet – finally. They search for those affected and experts on information portals and social media. Eventually, they come across a series of pathology tests that would determine whether vaccines played a role in Sawyer’s death. These tests determine C-reactive protein, indicating brain inflammation, liver enzymes, aluminum, mercury, and formaldehyde in brain and blood tissue, and various blood counts and vaccine titers.
Melissa asks the coroner to run these tests. However, he refuses, dismisses her concerns, and informs her that heavy metals cannot cause SIDS. His office blocks further emails from her as “undeliverable.”
Now, parents are searching across the country for a competent pathologist who is willing to carry out the laboratory tests they want – and a doctor who will order them. But the family doctor, the pediatrician, and Melissa’s gynecologist refuse.
The couple received further rejections for over six months. Then, they finally find a helpful pathologist. He will carry out the tests on June 21, 2023. Although some of Sawyer’s tissue samples have now decomposed, he still finds enough evidence for a detailed report. This arrives at the parents’ house in August – full of technical laboratory details, without any hints or recommendations, and with disappointingly little informative value.
A toxicologist agrees to evaluate the report. She will inform the parents at the beginning of September 2023. “She told us that Sawyer’s aluminum levels were very high.” The baby had 95 micrograms of aluminum per liter of blood – a level that would be toxic even to adults. The toxicologist explains to the couple that the aluminum and antigen levels in the blood are due to the Vaccines can be attributed. The acute illness could have played a role. “She advised us to seek legal advice.”
A brave policewoman breaks her silence.
At this time, Melissa and Nick may have heard about a brave policewoman who dared to go public with an explosive revelation that September. In a city of 350,000, Lynn Jennings (a pseudonym) studied three to four SIDS cases per month. She realized early on that collecting vaccination data was insightful. This showed that over half of the sudden infant deaths – around 300 – occurred within a week of vaccination. Superiors instructed Lynn to keep quiet about it. (2)
How likely is it that the connection between SIDS and vaccinations that the police officer noted was purely coincidental? (3)
Huge number of unreported cases
Did Melissa, Nick, and Lynn witness an extremely rare phenomenon that shouldn’t be made unnecessarily public? As early as 1965, the Leipzig pathologist Paul Mahnke had discovered in an investigation of 394 sudden deaths in children that in 22, or almost six percent, a “protective” vaccination was “causally involved.” (4) Was he exaggerating? According to the Federal Statistical Office, there were just 119 SIDS cases out of 715,000 live births in Germany in 2014; The risk would therefore be a tiny 0.017 percent. (5)
Actually? When it comes to vaccination, lying with numbers becomes the authorities’ favorite pastime. By definition, SIDS occurs when no cause can be determined in the sudden death of an infant or small child despite an autopsy and examination of the location where it was found. It is, therefore, a diagnosis of exclusion: pediatricians, pathologists, and forensic doctors only make it when all conceivable natural and non-natural causes of death, such as infections, metabolic disorders, bleeding, even after shaken trauma, malformations and accidents – poisoning, electricity, falls, hypothermia, suffocation, etc. – definitely excrete; In addition, nothing suspicious should come to light in the clinical history or the specific circumstances of death. The more suspiciously and thoroughly you look for it, the more likely you are to find clues. Vaccination appointments are the last thing. After all, the doctors involved are generally adamant that vaccines are effective and safe – so they are ruled out as a cause from the outset.
To better assess the extent of the problem, near-SIDS or near-missed-SIDS would have to be taken into account: near-SIDS cases in which an affected child could be resuscitated at the last moment. (Alte is also often mentioned, an abbreviation for the apparent life-threatening event – an acute life-threatening event with symptoms ranging from sudden stops in breathing to complete apathy to circulatory collapse.) (6) The number of unreported cases probably exceeds the SIDS rate tenfold. (7)
Vaccinations that a child receives before birth – as soon as their mother gets them – have so far gone particularly unnoticed. Where are risk studies on this? Numerous case reports indicate an increased likelihood of miscarriages, congenital defects, and autism in the children of mothers who were vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy.
SIDS through vaccination – why else?
How, strangely, often vaccinations and sudden infant deaths are closely related in time is by no means the only evidence that suggests the conclusion from correlation to causation. There are others:
SIDS rates in international comparison: The more frequently and the earlier children are vaccinated in countries around the world, the more SIDS cases are registered there. In Germany, Switzerland, and the USA, the earliest vaccinations usually take place in the first quarter after birth – this is when SIDS occurs most often. In this country, 80% of SIDS cases occur before the infant is six months old (8), a majority of them between the second and fourth months.
On the other hand, Japan postponed the first vaccinations until the second year of life. As a result, the SIDS rate there fell rapidly.
SIDS rates vary depending on vaccination type. As a Japanese study shows (9), certain vaccines make sudden infant deaths more likely.
SIDS rates depend on the time interval from vaccination. Most cases occur within the first week after a “jab.”
The more vaccinations, the higher the risk of death. (10) When scientists compared vaccination schedules and infant mortality rates in 34 countries, they found “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing numbers of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.” Children born in the United States are 76% more likely to die before their first birthday than infants in 19 other wealthy countries – they have received 26 doses of the vaccine by then, and nowhere else is the injection more eager. Why do American children have a more challenging time celebrating their first birthday than children in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Iceland, or Japan?
During the Corona lockdowns, vaccination rates fell drastically – as did the number of SIDS deaths. (See CLEAR TEXT: “Fewer premature babies, fewer sudden infant deaths – why?”)
The Australian doctor and scientist Viera Scheibner evaluated research from all over the world that appeared over the course of a century in her book Vaccination. (11) She devotes a longer chapter to sudden infant death syndrome. She also comes to the conclusion that tens of thousands of children around the world are “jabbed” to death every year.
In the USA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have just reported the most significant increase in the infant mortality rate in 20 years – in individual US states by 57% (Delaware), 30% (Iowa), and 27% (Maine). When did this trend start? In 2021 – when the Covid “vaccines” were approved for pregnant women. (12)
Distraction maneuvers with smoke candles
Are vaccine skeptics falling for fake news? According to a US study (13) that examined 568 SIDS cases from 1991 to 2008, 99% of affected children had at least one risk factor, and 75% even had two. The list is long and varied: It ranges from the mother’s older age and drug use, premature birth and passive smoking, a “socially stressed environment” to not breastfeeding, a bacterial infection with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, a “defect in the brain’s internal wake-up mechanism “to a nest-like bed frame, covering the head, insufficient air circulation and overheating through heating, clothing or blankets. (14) Blood flow to the brainstem or serotonin homeostasis may be disturbed. Or there is a lack of phosphate in the blood. Perhaps the pathogen Clostridium botulinum, which produces a paralyzing poison, is to blame; It occurs, for example, in contaminated honey. Toxic fumes from wallpaper and mattresses are also suspected of causing SIDS. Or the children fall victim to asymptomatic whooping cough, which remains undetected because the pathogen, the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, is so sensitive that it can no longer be detected on a cold corpse. (15) “New theories about possible causes appear almost every year,” noticed the internist Gerhard Buchwald, who became a committed vaccination critic in his immediate family due to severe vaccination damage. “During my time as a student, the doctrine was that the enlarged thymus gland constricted the windpipe and caused suffocation.” (16). Sometimes, the baby should definitely sleep in its own room; sometimes, it is better to sleep in the parent’s bed. Sometimes, the supine position was pilloried, and the prone position was promoted; sometimes, the opposite recommendation was applied.
All of these factors may come into play here and there. But why should they, individually or collectively, lead to more SIDS deaths in those countries where vaccination is most zealous and early? It doesn’t have to be a one-way causal street where vaccines kill babies. Instead, they could be the proverbial last drop in a barrel that existing pre-existing pressures had already filled to the brim.
Furthermore, the burden of proof does not lie with those affected but with the perpetrators and their henchmen. It is up to them to prove beyond doubt that ingredients such as formaldehyde, aluminum compounds, mercury, gallium, nickel, zirconium, titanium, and foreign proteins in childhood vaccines cannot possibly harm or even kill our youngest children.
Vakzines kill babies? Uuuuuuuuuuimpossible.
The “suspicion” of a “possible” connection between sudden infant death syndrome and vaccinations has been “refuted by extensive epidemiological studies,” Wikipedia assures us. Studies by the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have shown no evidence that childhood vaccines pose a risk of SIDS. (17) In fact, it has been shown that basic immunized infants actually have a lower risk of SIDS than unvaccinated infants. (18) Sixfold vaccinations are also said to reduce it by up to 50%. (19) “The higher the vaccination rate, the rarer sudden infant death,” proclaims the Berlin Charité.
There have been more sudden infant deaths in Sweden since fewer vaccinations against whooping cough have been made there. In the USA, the incidence of SIDS fell between 1975 and 2009, while vaccination rates for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis increased during the same period. From 2002 to 2021, it fell by a significant 22%. (20)
Germany is also recording a declining incidence of SIDS: in 1990, there were said to be 15 SIDS cases per 10,000 live births, and in 2013 there were only 2.2 cases. However, new, additional standard vaccinations were introduced during the same period. (21) In the past 30 years, the number of cases in this country is said to have fallen by a whopping 93%. While it was still at 1285 in 1991, it fell continuously to 82 by 2020.
However, seemingly falling SIDS rates can be easily identified, as can the “infected,” the vaccinated, the “unvaccinated,” and the “Covid victims” of the unspeakable corona pandemic. Over the past few decades, doctors have had to consider more and more risk factors and possible causes of death when issuing death certificates to infants and young children. At the same time, pressure grew on them to avoid the official note “SIDS” as much as possible in order to avoid creating space for speculation and unwanted inquiries. Both developments have ensured that more and more sudden infant deaths are becoming less and less common. And near-SIDS is not even recorded. In many countries, authorities are exploiting loopholes in the classification to obscure the role of vaccines. In India, for example, a national committee was asked to investigate 54 infant deaths following the administration of a quintuple vaccine. He quickly classified 52 of the 54 deaths as either accidental or unclassifiable. In the UK, scientists report that pathologists, coroners, and forensic pathologists are increasingly reluctant even to use the term SIDS, making the analysis of SIDS data “potentially inaccurate and confusing.” In the US, non-standard definitions result in “cases previously recorded as SIDS are now reported as ‘accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed,’ ‘asphyxia’ – lack of oxygen in the blood – or ’cause unknown/unspecified.'”
There is a rich bag of tricks available for manipulating data. Study participants can be labeled as “unvaccinated” as long as they are not yet “fully immunized,” i.e., they have not yet received all of the planned injections, but only one or two. Or you sort out test subjects who reacted particularly violently to the “spikes” on the grounds that it later turned out that they did not meet certain admission criteria, e.g. being free of underlying diseases – and such pre-existing conditions are quite common. as long as you look for them carefully enough. Or you can give the so-called “placebo group” not a harmless saline solution but a different vaccine – compared to the vaccine group, differences in side effects will disappear.
The much-cited “token study” on the safety of baby vaccinations, which the Robert Koch Institute organized, illustrates how brazenly scientists and authorities cheat to provide pleasant statistics. Their full claim: They should completely record all unexplained SIDS cases in children between the ages of two and 24 months who died between the summer of 2005 and the summer of 2008 – and check whether these deaths are related to previous vaccinations. The financing of the study was already surprising: for a sponsorship amount of 2.5 million euros, the manufacturers of two vaccines to be tested, Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), bought the right to “be informed immediately about relevant results or assessments” – and “To be given the opportunity to provide a scientific opinion on the texts intended for publication” before they are published.
Only 254 cases in which affected parents were willing to fill out a comprehensive questionnaire were included in the analysis. Of the 667 mothers and fathers whose child died during the study period, two-thirds refused to participate, despite being contacted several times. I wonder why? After such a painful loss, who is still eager to satisfy the curiosity of data collectors?
Last but not least, the “token study” managed the feat of delivering two diametrically opposed findings at the same time: the official one and one that only came to light when the basic data was analyzed – the RKI hid it in the 160-page long version of the study report it was only available in English. As expected, the German short version gave the all-clear: the vaccines are harmless – inattentive, careless parents appear to be to blame for the deaths. The RKI placed non-significant but pleasant details at the forefront of its reporting, and rather than simply counting SIDS cases, it “weighted” them until agreeable conclusions emerged.
If you look closely, the RKI data actually shows:
– A case of SIDS is three times more likely in the first 14 days after vaccination than in the following weeks.
– Three days after a six-fold vaccination, the risk of death is increased by a factor of 2 to 3, and after a five-fold vaccination, it is even 8.1-fold increased.
– During the second year of life, the likelihood of dying within 72 hours of vaccination increases almost 14-fold. (22)
Would the current state of research actually refute skeptics: Why do affected parents encounter massive resistance when they insist on clarifying the true cause of death of their vaccinated baby? Helga Rühl, a board member of the “Parents for Vaccination Education” (EFI), and herself, an affected mother, experienced that they “have a harder time than Don Quixote in the fight against the windmill blades.” In the mid-1990s, she submitted an application to both the Petitions Committee of the Federal Republic of Germany and her state government to introduce a reporting requirement for sudden infant death syndrome, to investigate the proximity to previous vaccinations and, in principle, to carry out an autopsy of the deceased children. Near-SIDS cases should be included. Her application was rejected twice.
So that Sawyer’s tragic death has meaning
Since Melissa and Nick lost their little boy, the two of them have done everything they can to make the whole truth about his death public – to warn other parents before they suffer the same fate. “Sawyer is the reason we are alive right now. And it is our motivation,” they say. “We want to make other people aware of it and put an end to the whole thing.” Because it is now clear to them:
“Children don’t need vaccines. And if they do get vaccinated, they don’t need them until they’re at least two years old. The problem is that their blood-brain barrier doesn’t close until they’re two years old or later. (…) And if you’re vaccinated before the age of two, the aluminum can cross that blood-brain barrier. That’s why the levels are so high, and it stops breathing and causes cardiac arrest.”
Nick adds: “I wouldn’t tell anyone, ‘Don’t get your kids vaccinated.’ But I would definitely say, ‘Do your research. Go to the end of the internet and make sure what you’re doing is right and that you know all the possible consequences. Because it’s your baby, not the doctor’s.’
When asked why more doctors don’t speak out, Melissa answers with a single keyword: “Career suicide.”
Now she “doesn’t even want to be a nurse anymore. Why would I still want this? But I have to pay my bills.”
Now, the couple plans to file a claim with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Established in 1980, VICP decides on compensation for vaccination victims – usually to their disadvantage. Melissa is correspondingly skeptical about the chances of success “because I know what the government and the medical system are like.” (23)
(Harald Wiesendanger)
Remarks
1 Deren Wirkstoff Acetaminophen steht im Verdacht, Autismus wahrscheinlicher zu machen, siehe https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kids-acetaminophen-tylenol-autism/
2 Der Online-Journalist Ben Tapper diskutiert Lynns Beobachtung mit dem impfkritischen Blogger Steve Kirsch hier: https://rumble.com/v37wtp4-ben-tapper-tells-the-story-of-sids-investigations-linking-sids-and-vaccines.html. Siehe auch https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/sudden-infant-deaths-vaccination/
3 Zur statistischen Berechnung der Zufallswahrscheinlichkeit siehe https://kirschsubstack.com/i/135760531/too-many-sids-cases-happened-within-a-week-of-the-vaccine-for-the-vaccine-not-to-have-caused-the-deaths
4 Paul Mahnke: „Plötzlicher Tod im Kindesalter und vorausgegangene Schutzimpfung“, Deutsche Zeitschrift für die gesamte gerichtliche Medizin 56 (2) März 1965, S. 66-73, https://journals.scholarsportal.info/details?uri=/03670031/v56i0002/66_ptikuvs.xml
5 Statistisches Bundesamt: Todesursachen bei Säuglingen. 2015. (destatis.de/ archive.org (Memento vom 17. November 2017 im Internet Archive)
6 ICD-10-GM Version 2010 – R06.80 Akutes lebensbedrohliches Ereignis im Säuglingsalter. (dimdi.de (Memento vom 18. Mai 2015 im Internet Archive)
7 Nach https://www.impfkritik.de/sids/index.html
8 Karl H. P. Bentele: Der plötzliche Tod im Neugeborenen- und Säuglingsalter. S. 2 (aerztekammer-hamburg.de (Memento vom 21. Dezember 2005 im Internet Archive), PDF)
9 Motoki Osawa u.a.: „Sudden Infant Death After Vaccination: Survey of Forensic Autopsy Files“, 2010, American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 40(3): S. 232-237, September 2019.https://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/fulltext/2019/09000/sudden_infant_death_after_vaccination__survey_of.5.aspx
10 Siehe Bert Ehgartner: Gute Impfung – Schlechte Impfung, Steyr 2018, S. 39.
11 Die deutsche Übersetzung erschien im Januar 2000: Impfungen, Immunschwäche und Plötzlicher Kindstod, https://www.amazon.de/Impfungen-Immunschw%C3%A4che-Pl%C3%B6tzlicher-Kindstod-Scheibner/dp/3887211669/ref=sr_1_3?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&crid=920LDYW9I6RF&keywords=Viera+Scheibner&qid=1699699290&s=books&sprefix=viera+scheibner%2Cstripbooks%2C104&sr=1-3, Leider vergriffen, auf dem Gebrauchtbüchermarkt zu horrenden Preisen angeboten.
12 Näheres hier: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-largest-infant-mortality-rate-increase-twenty-years/?utm_id=20231113
13 (Felicia L. Trachtenberg et al. “Risk factor changes for sudden infant death syndrome after initiation of Back-to-Sleep campaign“, Pediatrics, Band 129, Nr. 4, April 2012, S. 630–638, doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1419, PMID 22451703, PMC 3356149 (freier Volltext).
14 M. Vennemann, D. Fischer, M. Findeisen: „Kindstodinzidenz im internationalen Vergleich“, Monatsschrift für Kinderheilkunde 151/2003, S. 510–513, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00112-003-0715-0
15 Medical Tribune vom 7. September 1993.
16 Gerhard Buchwald: Impfen – Das Geschäft mit der Angst (1994), 5. Aufl. Lahnstein 2008, S. 251.
17 Daten zur Pharmakovigilanz von Impfstoffen / Meldungen über tödliche Verläufe (PDF) Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Bulletin für Arzneimittelsicherheit Nr. 1 (März 2014), S. 26.
18 R. Kurz, Th. Kenner, C. Poets, R. Kerbl, M. Vennemann, G. Jorch (Hrsg.): Der plötzliche Säuglingstod – Risikofaktoren – Prävention – Elternberatung. 2. Auflage. Springer, 2014, ISBN 978-3-7091-1444-5, S. 129.
19 K. Weißer et al.: Sicherheit von Impfstoffen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, November 2009, abgerufen am 27. Oktober 2019; M. M. Vennemann et al.: Sudden infant death syndrome: No increased risk after immunisation. In: Vaccine. 2006. PMID 16945457; M. M. Vennemann et al.: Do immunisations reduce the risk for SIDS? A meta-analysis. In: Vaccine. Band 25, Nr. 26, 21. Juni 2007, S. 4875–4879, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.077, PMID 17400342.
20 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr033.pdf, dort S. 4
21 Doris Oberle et al.: Impfkomplikationen und der Umgang mit Verdachtsfällen. In: Bundesgesundheitsblatt. Band 62, Nr. 4, 1. April 2019, S. 450–461, doi:10.1007/s00103-019-02913-1.
22 Einzelheiten über Sawyers schrecklichen Fall sind hier nachzulesen: https://jennifermargulis.substack.com/p/autopsy-confirms-infant-died-from, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/maine-baby-sawyer-vaccine-death-aluminum/?utm_id=20230917, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Sawyer-Death-Certificate.jpg; https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Sawyer-Tox-Report.jpg
Image: Collage aus 3 Fotos (Freepik, childrenshealthdefense.org)