by Dr.Harald Wiesendanger– Klartext
What the mainstream media is hiding
Do vaccines actually improve health? Using flimsy excuses, the authorities have consistently refused to conduct scientific, thorough investigations into the alleged connection. However, hundreds of studies have now shown that vaccinated people have a much higher risk of many chronic diseases. It grows more often the earlier it is” “picked.”” Parents need to be clear about what they might be doing to their child if they ignore this fact.
Yes, the majority of vaccines appear largely safe – within six weeks, but often only for two to four days, during which their side effects are controlled in clinical studies. Only individual vaccinations are being tested, although infants now receive up to nine vaccines at once. (1)
What does this lead to in the long term? What do vaccines do months, years, and decades after the “spikes”?
There is only one way to determine this: by comparing vaccinated people with unvaccinated people.
But to this day, health authorities have refused to carry out appropriate investigations.
It is thanks to curious, courageous scientists that such studies have long been available. Not just a few. There are hundreds of them – methodologically high-quality, peer-reviewed, and published in respected specialist journals. They agree and prove it crystal clear: Vaccines increase the risk of becoming chronically ill – not just a statistical bit, but highly significant. Downright dramatic. They expose one of the supposed “”greatest achievements in the history of medicine”” (2) as a terrible debacle – even more than a monstrous crime, to the extent that those responsible consciously accept it.
The eye-openers include six recent studies published between 2017 and 2022. Using different research approaches, they independently come to one and the same conclusion: so-called “”vaccinations”” do not protect our health in any way. On the contrary.
The two Mawson studies:
Six to twelve-year-olds are clearly better off unvaccinated
In 2017, Anthony Mawson, a professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of Jackson, Mississippi, revealed what is being done to children when official vaccination calendars are mercilessly enforced on them. His research team surveyed the parents of 666 six- to 12-year-old children who were homeschooled. Of them, 197 were fully vaccinated, 208 partially vaccinated, and 261 not at all. (3)
Chickenpox and whooping cough occurred noticeably less frequently among those vaccinated. But they paid a high price for their health: they were far more likely than unvaccinated people to suffer from allergic rhinitis (30 times higher risk), from learning disabilities (5.2 times), from ADHD, and autism (4.2 times each), of allergies (3.9 times), of neurodevelopmental disorders (3.7 times), of dermatitis (2.9 times). The fully vaccinated group was also at a severe disadvantage when it came to pneumonia (6.4% versus 1.2%) and ear infections (19.8% versus 5.8%). Partially vaccinated children generally achieved” “a middle position””.
In the same year, Mawson confirmed these results in a follow-up study. (4)
The Hooker/Miller Studies:
“”Picks”” in the first year of life are particularly fatal.
Brian Hooker can hardly be found lacking in scientific expertise. After all, he is Professor Emeritus of Biology at Simpson University in Redding, California. Together with science author Neil Miller, he examined disease rates for 2,047 children from three American medical practices. (5)
Born between 2005 and 2015, the little ones were 3 to 12 years old at the time of the study. 69% had been vaccinated against any disease in the first year of life, 31% had not.
To ensure that a disorder or illness actually followed the vaccination – rather than preceded it – the authors only included those that occurred after the child’schild’s first birthday.
For all diagnoses for which meaningful data was available, the research team found that children who were spared “pikse” in their first twelve months of life were far less likely to become ill. By age five, those vaccinated early were more than twice as likely to develop developmental delays and ear infections of asthma 4.5 times higher.
A year later, in 2021, Hooker and Miller followed up with a second study, this time with data from 1,565 children. (6) Of these, 8.7% were fully vaccinated – i.e., “”correctly”” according to the vaccination calendar -30.9% were partially vaccinated, and 60.4% were not at all. Fully vaccinated people were far more likely to suffer from asthma (17.6% vs. 4.9%), gastrointestinal illnesses (13.8 vs. 2.5%), and chronic ear infections (27.8% vs. 2, 13%). Severe allergies, autism, and ADHD also occurred much more often in them.
The Lyons-Weiler/Thomas study:
Vaccinated children are much more likely to see a doctor.
Together with the scientist James Lyons-Weiler, Dr. Paul Thomas, a pediatrician from Portland, Oregon, conducted a study of 3,324 small patients that he cared for in his practice over the course of over ten years. (7) They compared the number of doctor visits between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. How often did Thomas see her for certain diagnoses? Whether because of asthma, hay fever or allergic rhinitis – an inflammation of the nasal mucosa -, eczema, dermatitis, urticaria (hives), conjunctivitis, weight/eating disorders, anemia, respiratory infections, ADHD, autism: vaccinated children appeared significantly more often with all of these problems at the doctor.
All in all, the data only allowed one conclusion: “Unvaccinated children are generally healthier than vaccinated ones.”
Amazingly, the doctor found a reputable journal that published his peer-reviewed findings. But just five days after publication, he lost his medical license – he represented a “”threat”” to public health. His study report was promptly withdrawn.
The” “Control Group”” study:
Those who are completely unvaccinated are by far healthier.
A fifth exciting study (8) comes from The Control Group, an American citizens’citizens’ group that aims to “”conduct realistic and controlled research and documentation on the effects of vaccinations – in search of the truth about health and the well-being of our children, our families, our friends and ourselves.””
As many as 99.74% of the US population has been vaccinated. Only 0.26% – an estimated 832,000 Americans – do not yet have any vaccine in their bodies. From this minority, the researchers drew a sample of 0.178% – a total of 1,482 children and adults from 48 US states. The question was: How often do serious illnesses occur among these completely unvaccinated people, compared to the vaccinated majority? The status of their health can be found in publicly available national statistics.
Once again, it became clear: unvaccinated people, regardless of age, are healthier – by far.
Among vaccinated children, one in two now suffers from chronic health problems; in 2010, it was only 27%. They are much more likely to suffer from: asthma, eczema, food allergies, ringing in the ears, misaligned eyes, ADHD, autism, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis. The probability of at least one such diagnosis is 3.5 times higher than for unvaccinated children. The probability of being affected by multiple chronic diseases is even 5.7 times higher.
Because vaccinations place a cumulative burden on adults throughout their lives, their health situation becomes even more concerning. They are 9.5 times more likely to develop chronic diseases such as asthma and arthritis, as well as some of the leading causes of death, such as diabetes, cancer, heart disease – and respiratory diseases. They are 43 times more likely to have two chronic illnesses—12% of them even five.
Vaccinated people, in general, across all age groups, were 44 times more likely to develop digestive disorders and 207 times more likely to have chronic sinusitis or sinus infections.
What is particularly astonishing is the spectrum of diseases that were not detected at all in the unvaccinated test subjects. Not a single baby in the families examined had died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and not a single one had cancer. In unvaccinated adults, no ADHD, no asthma, no arthritis, no diabetes, no heart disease, and no malignant tumors occurred.
“”So what does all this data mean?”” asks US doctor Peter McCullough in an excellent video documentary, promptly censored by Facebook and YouTube, in which he summarizes the studies mentioned. “”Quite simply: They suggest that vaccines lead to sicker lives overall. In fact, it is the unvaccinated whose lives are generally blessed with excellent health and few doctor visits.””
The RKI lies – it covers up its own findings.
The high risk posed by vaccinations was proven – involuntarily – by Germany’sGermany’s highest health authority, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). From 2003 to 2006, it conducted an extensive long-term study (“”KiGGS” “) on the physical and mental health of children and young people between the ages of 0 and 17. The 17,641 study participants or their parents filled out an extensive questionnaire, doctors conducted interviews with them, blood and urine samples were analyzed – and vaccination certificates were copied, if available. Just one year after data collection was completed, the RKI presented the results in the Federal Health Gazette on over 900 pages. It made the raw data available to interested parties as a” “public use file”” for a nominal fee of 90 euros. (9)
That’sThat’s how much Angelika Müller thought it was worth. The computer scientist, mother of four, and head of the interest group “”Parents for Vaccination Education”” meticulously examined the RKI material – around 1,500 data values per participant. She came across” “grossly incorrect evaluations,”” manipulated numbers, and concealed connections.
What actually emerged from the RKI raw data exceeded their worst fears. Vaccinated children are almost twice as likely to suffer from neurodermatitis and hay fever and five times more likely to suffer from a nickel allergy. (See Figure 1 below.) They are diagnosed with ADHD more often. They are more susceptible to infections and more often need glasses and speech therapy from a speech therapist (Fig. 2, 3). Middle ear and pneumonia occur more frequently in them. (Fig. 4)
Not a single unvaccinated child, but 5.3% of vaccinated children, has a twisted or curved spine (see Fig. 4). What could vaccinations have to do with scoliosis? The possible contributing causes, which are mentioned as a side effect in almost all vaccine leaflets, include nerve diseases and so-called neuropathies. Continuous incorrectly controlled tension in the muscles near the spine could lead to misalignment of the vertebrae over time.
Surprisingly, vaccinated children are significantly more susceptible to chickenpox and scarlet fever – the very infectious diseases from which a “”spades”” should protect them (Fig. 5). Measles, mumps, and rubella occur somewhat less frequently in vaccinated people (Fig. 6) – but should they occur at all? Out of a hundred people vaccinated with MMR, 10 still get measles, four get mumps, and eight get rubella.
Angelika Müller’sMüller’s conclusion is correspondingly clear: “Unvaccinated children are healthier in every respect than vaccinated ones.” (10)
Significant: The KiGGS study by the Robert Koch Institute proves – involuntarily – this connection between health status and vaccination status, as the computer scientist Angelika Mueller found out when reanalyzing the RKI data.
Soon afterwards, between 2005 and 2008, the Robert Koch Institute demonstrated once again how brazenly scientists and authorities cheat in order to provide pleasant statistics: with the TOKEN study on the safety of baby vaccinations. Its full-bodied claim: It should completely record all unexplained cases of “”sudden infant death syndrome”” (SIDS) between two and 24 months old that occurred between summer 2005 and summer – and check whether these deaths are related to previous vaccinations. The financing of the study was already surprising: for a sponsorship amount of 2.5 million euros, the manufacturers of two vaccines to be tested, Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmithKline, bought the right to be “immediately informed about relevant results or assessments” – and “the opportunity to “To receive a scientific opinion on the texts intended for publication” before they are published.
Only 254 cases in which affected parents were willing to fill out a comprehensive questionnaire were included in the analysis. Of the 667 mothers and fathers whose children died during the study period, two-thirds refused to participate despite being contacted several times. I wonder why? After such a painful loss, who is still eager to satisfy the curiosity of data collectors?
Last but not least, the TOKEN study managed the feat of delivering two diametrically opposed findings at the same time: the official one and one that only came to light when the basic data was analyzed – the RKI hid it in the 160-page long version of the study report, which they only provided in English. As expected, the German short version gave the all-clear: the vaccines are harmless – inattentive, careless parents appear to be to blame for the deaths. The RKI placed non-significant but pleasant details at the forefront of its reporting, and rather than simply counting SIDS cases, it “”weighted”” them until politically correct conclusions emerged.
If you look closely, the RKI data actually shows:
– A case of SIDS is three times more likely in the first 14 days after vaccination than in the following weeks.
– Three days after a six-fold vaccination, the risk of death is increased by a factor of 2 to 3, and after a five-fold vaccination, it is even 8.1-fold increased.
– During the second year of life, the likelihood of dying within 72 hours of vaccination increases almost 14-fold.
According to the RKI, it is a “”fact”” that “”vaccinations are particularly important for infants and small children,”” which is why they should take place”” at the earliest possible point in time.”” At least the shareholders of vaccine manufacturers should agree without further ado.
How do vaccines make you sick?
How do vaccines work? The principle seems simple and logical. During “”active vaccination”,” the body receives weakened pathogens that are still capable of reproducing (“”live vaccines””), killed pathogens, or just fragments of them (“”inactivated vaccines””). Both approaches are intended to stimulate him to form antibodies against it. In “”passive vaccination”” a serum is injected that already contains high concentrations of such antibodies.
In this way, it is said, vaccinations train the immune system for an emergency: an infection with dangerous bacteria or viruses. If this happens, it can fight them off because it already has the necessary antibodies.
Parents allow their child to be “”piksed”” because this explanation makes sense to them. But they only know half the truth. On the one hand, vaccines carry the risk of causing the very disease they are intended to protect against. (This happens regularly, for example, in polio vaccination campaigns.) On the other hand, vaccines introduce many other ingredients into the body – into the blood, into the brain, and into all other organs. Doctors tend to ignore them in educational discussions. At most, the questionable substances appear in the package insert. They are strongly suspected of being responsible for a large part of the vaccine damage that manufacturers and authorities sweep under the carpet.
The “Working Group on Civil Rights and Health” (AGBUG) had independent laboratories examine what was actually in the syringes between 2017 and 2019. 83 vaccines, the majority of which are still on the market, were examined. The findings are hair-raising: almost all vaccines contain trace amounts of aluminum and mercury. In addition, there are foreign proteins, hormones, and metabolic products from manufacturing processes in which non-human cell cultures, chicken eggs, or laboratory animals are infected. Antibiotics, pesticides, and undeclared nanoparticles were also found in it. They often turn out to be contaminated with viruses from the cell cultures on which they were grown: from variants of the pig virus to SV-40 – from kidney cells of rhesus monkeys – to viruses from chicken cells, which can cause leukemia in birds.
How harmless are these ingredients in the long term? Security checks are pending and there are no regulations for this. Aside from concerned parents, no one seems interested in taking a closer look.
So-called “effective enhancers” (adjuvants, from the Latin adiuvare: support) are suspected of causing illness: artificial substances without which a defense reaction would be too weak to build up lasting immunity.
Highly toxic aluminum is also the most common adjuvant. It makes the blood-brain barrier more permeable and causes a variety of neurological diseases, chronic inflammation, and autoimmune diseases; it can lead to so-called macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF), a particularly insidious muscle disease. Newer adjuvants such as “AS04” or “MF59” contain squalene and polysorbate 80. In laboratory tests, they cause MS symptoms, promote tumors, and cause the protective myelin sheaths around nerve cells to degenerate, as well as the mucous membranes of the intestine. Just like aluminum, they trigger autoimmune diseases such as arthritis and lupus erythematosus. They cause sexual organs to mature more quickly while at the same time impairing their function. (11)
Preservatives in vaccines are also highly questionable. As a replacement for the previously common mercury, phenoxyethanol has recently been used: a chemical that is used to euthanize fish and make personal and beauty care products last longer. As can be seen from databases of cosmetic manufacturers, phenoxyethanol can cause allergies, skin rashes, neurological diseases, immune deficiencies, and organ damage. In animal experiments, it leads to genetic defects and cancer. According to the safety data sheet, it must not end up in household waste or in groundwater.
In such “minimal” quantities as in vaccines, where the applicable limit values are well below the applicable limit values, the additives mentioned are completely “harmless,” health authorities say. To understand how boldly people deceive us about the dangers of inoculated aluminum, all you need is a calculator. According to EFSA, the European Food Safety Authority, the tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of aluminum is one milligram per kilogram of body weight. (12) However, we ingest food orally; our body only absorbs 0.1% of the aluminum it contains – but 100% if it is injected into a muscle or directly into the blood. Accordingly, the limit value should be more like 0.001 mg. The aluminum content of the vaccine approved in Europe is between 0.125 and 0.82 mg per “spike”. With an injection of 0.8 mg, an infant weighing five kilos will consume around 160 times (0.8: 0.005) the permissible maximum weekly dose. Extrapolated over the entire year – 1 mg times 52 weeks times 7 kg (average body weight) – the limit value is exceeded by more than twice with a single six-fold vaccination. No reason to worry? Why is “ASIA,” the “autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants,” now considered an independent clinical picture in medicine?
The sooner, the more – the worse
In 1970, the Robert Koch Institute recommended a single dose of vaccine for the first twelve months and another five up to the age of six. Three and a half decades later, in 2006, that had grown to 30 before the first birthday, and another ten in the five years that followed. And today? A child in Germany should now be vaccinated against 17 different infectious diseases “at the earliest possible date.” In addition, including “boosters,” there are a whopping 53 doses of vaccination up to the age of majority – 37 of them in the first year of life.
Things are even more vaccination-mad in the United States. According to the CDC vaccination calendar (13), children should receive at least 73 vaccinations against 17 different diseases. They have to be given 28 injections by their first birthday alone. At just two months old, a baby can receive up to six vaccinations against eight diseases. As recently as 1962, the vaccination calendar only called for five doses of vaccine throughout childhood: against polio, smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough. (14) The pharmaceutical industry currently has over a hundred more vaccines in the pipeline in Europe alone (15) – it dreams of this type of “preventive medicine.”
Numerous studies make it abundantly clear to anyone who wants to see what such health “protection” does: the earlier and the more often children are “poked,” the greater their risk of health problems, serious chronic illnesses, and premature death. (16) This trend has been evident for a long time in all industrialized countries.
Why is the world vaccination champion, the USA, far behind in child mortality in 55th place, behind the Maldives, Russia, and Cuba? (Germany is in 25th place.) The leader, with the lowest rate, is Montenegro: there, under 1,000 newborns die each year with a statistical average of 1.46; in the USA, it is 6.3. (In Germany 3.6.) In Montenegro, not even every second resident believes that vaccines are effective and safe – in the United States, however, three-quarters do.
Although the United States spends by far the most money on child health, a baby is 76% more likely to die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in its first year of life than in 19 other wealthy countries. (17) In March and April 2020, of all places, when no babies came to doctor’s offices to be “poked” due to Corona “lockdowns”, the SIDS rate in the United States fell by around 35%.
What happens to such information? Facebook blocks them. Twitter deletes them. Google hides them. YouTube bans them. The media is silent about it – or brands it as a conspiracy theory. Talk shows talk about them; news programs ignore them. This raises the suspicion that they are true.
Why are doctors silent?
Why don’t vaccinating doctors inform their patients about this? Because they themselves need clarification. For what reason? Because during their studies, in lectures given by professors on honorary lists from pharmaceutical companies, they learn just as little about the risks and dangers of vaccination as they do from textbooks written by pharmaceutical-funded authors, neither in pharmaceutical-sponsored training events and congresses nor from pharmaceutical-financed specialist magazines, online information portals and announcements from professional organizations. (18)
If a doctor again pressures you to have your child vaccinated as quickly as possible, recommend the following two books to him – and promise him that you will agree with the “Spades” as soon as he has taken note of the approximately 500 studies presented therein and convincingly refuted them:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr./Brian Hooker: Vaccinated versus unvaccinated – Now the science speaks! (2023)
Neil Z. Miller: The Big Vaccination Report – 400 critical studies for parents and researchers (2021)
Actually, every doctor should already know them before he ignores his patients’ basic right to physical integrity. How can he get your “informed consent” when he himself lacks crucial information to give you to consider? Don’t be afraid to test your competence in a disrespectful way – after all, nothing less is at stake than your child’s future. Anyone who questions appears clueless. Anyone who forgoes it stays there. Let him sign the “Medical Vaccination Declaration” drawn up by the Swiss “Vaccination Decision Network” – a doctor who is aware of his responsibility should not hesitate.
Preventing harm to the population is not just a matter for doctors. The Federal President, the Chancellor, and every member of the government take their oath of office, especially the Minister of Health. Where are government research initiatives to finally provide clarity?
Why are health authorities opposed to this, especially the Robert Koch Institute?
Lazy excuses
We are told that it is unnecessary to carry out extensive research – because the probability of serious side effects is, as we all know, just “one in a million.”
In order to give us this calming pill, authorities compare the total number of vaccinated people with the group of people whose vaccination injuries have received state recognition, which led to compensation payments. This is actually a tiny minority – which comes as no surprise to anyone who knows what a stressful, time-consuming, nerve-wracking hurdle vaccination victims have to overcome in order to get their rights. Reputable studies estimate the rate of undesirable side effects at 1 in 38 (19), even 1 in 10. (20)
We are assured that the highest quality of all scientific studies are carried out to assess risks: randomized controlled trials (RCT). Test subjects are randomly divided into two groups: one receives the drug (“verum group”), and the other receives just a placebo (“control group”). In order to exclude the expected effects, all participants were “blinded”: they remained uncertain about which group they belonged to.
For the comparison to be meaningful, the RCT design stipulates that a placebo must be “inert,” i.e., without a pharmacological effect, for example, a neutral saline solution. Scandalously, in most vaccine studies, no genuine placebos are used in the control groups, but rather other vaccines. Or the placebo contains the same ingredients, except for the respective antigens, i.e., without the viruses or bacterial components against which antibodies are to be formed: from aluminum to formaldehyde to polysorbate 80. This was supposedly the case with Gardasil, a vaccine against the human papilloma virus Causes cervical cancer: It was allowed to compete against AAHS, a highly toxic adjuvant. (Adjuvants are substances added to vaccines to produce a “more robust immune response” than the antigen alone would produce.). A meningococcal vaccine was used to “control” a flu vaccine in pregnant women. (21) Such an outrageous reach into the bag of tricks, basically a clumsy fraud, regularly results in the damage profile of the tested substance appearing comparatively harmless because the placebo group is also poisoned – to the understandable delight of the manufacturers, who usually finance such pseudo studies.
Furthermore, there are other analysis methods available that deliver no less reliable results, be they prospective, aimed at future health consequences, or retrospective, which evaluate existing medical data. (22) Health authorities routinely work with such procedures. Only when it comes to vaccination do they suddenly become afraid of contact?
It is often said that comparative studies involving vaccinated and unvaccinated people are “unethical.” For placebo control, some of the test subjects would have to be deprived of a drug that “can possibly prevent a serious, untreatable or fatal infection,” as it says on the website of a children’s clinic. (23) This cannot be justified under any circumstances. But the same argument can be made with all drug tests: How can one refrain from giving patients in the control group a new heart or cancer drug that could potentially save their lives? The fact that vaccination advocates are suddenly plagued by moral concerns only when it comes to vaccine studies indicates an agenda that has very little to do with science and logic.
The ethics argument is also absurd because you don’t even know how a vaccine works before starting an RCT study. Does it mean more of a blessing than a curse for the Verum group? Would it, therefore, be beneficial rather than harmful for the control group also to receive it? This is precisely what needs to be found out first.
Vaccinated and unvaccinated children cannot be compared with one another simply because they grow up in different social environments, which have a significant influence on their health development. If unvaccinated people get sick less often, they may owe this less to their parents’ vaccine skepticism than to their parenting behavior. They may be more worried about their offspring, take symptoms more seriously, look after them more carefully if they become ill, take them to the doctor more quickly if necessary, and pay attention to better nutrition and more exercise.
This argument can hardly be surpassed in terms of curiosity. Doesn’t the recommendation suggest this?: “Dear moms and dads, if you want healthy children – take parents who are critical of vaccinations as role models!”
Ironically, Anthony Fauci, America’s vaccination pope and Big Pharma’s darling for decades, comes with the urgent warning: If regulatory authorities fail to monitor the longer-term effects of vaccinations, “then it could turn out that it takes twelve years before all hell really breaks loose – and then what damage have you done?” (24) He is right.
But “hell” has long been here. “The same story has been repeating itself for 225 years,” said the American internist Dr. Suzanne Humphries states (25): “Vaccines are coming onto the market and are exacerbating diseases that were not actually very problematic before. (…) The narrative of ‘safe and effective’ vaccination is a carefully manufactured illusion. (…) It is a dark night of the soul when you wake up. Your whole world is falling apart because you realize that the entire medical system is corrupt.” US holistic doctor Joseph Mercola agrees: “The vaccine industry is deliberately deceiving us about the risks and benefits of vaccines in order to make a profit, without regard to human suffering and destruction of public health over time.” (26)
“Sometimes people ask me, ‘What’s the drive? Why are they doing this?'” Humphries said. “My answer is that I can’t fully answer the why. “Certainly, greed plays a role, but I think there are probably much worse things at play.” (27)
Sponsored by the pharmaceutical lobby (28), the World Health Organization sees anti-vaxxers like Humphries and Mercola as a “global threat.” She counts vaccine hesitancy among the “ten most serious threats to the health of humanity.” Seriously? The current state of research suggests that it would be far more dangerous to give up reluctance to vaccinate. In most cases, infections do not overcome the immune system but rather strengthen it. Those most likely to fear it are those who stubbornly neglect it.
We have known since the Corona crisis at the latest: Fear endangers health, knowledge strengthens the immune system.
Remarks
1. In addition to the six-fold vaccination – against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B – vaccinations against rotaviruses, meningococci and pneumococci have recently been added.
2 https://www.unicef.de/informieren/aktuelles/blog/-/elf-dinge-ueber-impfungen-zur-weltimpfwoche/275230; https://www.ardalpha.de/wissen/gesundheit/gesund-leben/die-erfolgsgeschichte-des-impfens-impfung-100.html
3 Anthony R. Mawson u.a.: “Pilot Comparative Study on the Health of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. Children “, Journal of Translational Science 3 (3) 2017, S. 1-12, DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186,
4 Anthony R. Mawson u.a.: “Preterm Birth, Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study of 6- to 12-Year-Old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children “, Journal of Translational Science 3 (3) 2017, S. 1-8, DOI:10.15761/JTS.1000187
5 Brian Hooker/Neil Z. Miller: “Analysis of Health Outcomes in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children: Developental Delays, Asthma, Ear Infections, and Gastrointestinal Disorders, “SAGE Open Medicine 8/2020, DOI:10.1177/2050312120925344
6 Brian Hooker/Neil Z. Miller: “Health Effects in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Children “, Journal of Translational Science 7/2021, S. 1-11, DOI:10.15761/JTS.1000459
7 James Lyons-Weiler/Paul Thomas: “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses along the Axis of Vaccination,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (22) 2020, 8674, DOI:10.3390/ijerph17228674,
8 Joy Garner: “The Control Group: Pilot Survey of Unvaccinated Americans. Statistical Evaluation of Health Outcomes in the Unvaccinated: Full Report “, 9. Februar 2021
9 Public-Use-File KiGGS, Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey 2003-2006, Robert-Koch-Institut, Berlin 2008
10 https://efi-online.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/UngeimpfteGesuender.pdf, S. 6.
11 Siehe zusammenfassend Harald Wiesendanger: Das Gesundheitsunwesen, a.a.O, S. 334 ff. und die dort zitierten Quellen.
12 Europäische Behörde für Lebensmittelsicherheit (EFSA), EFSA-Beratung zur Sicherheit von Aluminium in Lebensmitteln, 15. Juli 2008, abrufbar unter https://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/news/efsa-advises-safety-aluminium-food.
13 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: “Birth-18 Years Immunization Schedule “
14 Siehe Robert F. Kennedy Jr./Brian Hooker: Geimpft versus ungeimpft – Jetzt spricht die Wissenschaft! (2023), S. 20,
15 https://web.oevih.at/unser_fokus/forschungsausblick-impfstoff-pipeline/; https://pharma-fakten.de/grafiken/rsv-grippe-covid-19-und-co-neue-loesungen-dank-impfstoffforschung-in-sicht/
16 Siehe Robert F. Kennedy Jr./Brian Hooker: Geimpft versus ungeimpft – Jetzt spricht die Wissenschaft! (2023), S. 34-61
17 https://www.klartext-online.info/post/damit-sein-tod-nicht-sinnlos-war; https://www.klartext-online.info/post/blo%C3%9F-ein-piks-zwei-tage-sp%C3%A4ter-tot
18 Siehe Harald Wiesendanger: Das Gesundheitsunwesen – Wie wir es durchschauen, überleben und verwandeln (2019) sowie die zehnteilige Serie „Dressierte Halbgötter“ in seinem Blog „Klartext“
19 Ross Lazarus u.a.: „Electronic Support for Public Health-Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP: VAERS), The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Mech2011
20 Kennedy/Hooker: Geimpft versus ungeimpft, a.a.O., S. 6.
21 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985566/, DOI.10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30054-8
22 DOI:10.1002/14651858. MR000034.pub2, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8191367/
23 The College of Physicians of Philadelphia: “Vaccines 101: Ethical Issues and Vaccines “
24 Nova, PBS, “Surviving AIDS “, 2. February 1999.
25 Suzanne Humphries/Roman Bystrianyk: Die Impf-Illusion. Infektionskrankheiten, Impfungen und die unterdrückten Fakten (2015)
26 Joseph Mercola in mercola.com, 25. Februar 2024
27 Elizabeth Humphries im Interview mit Joseph Mercola: „Dissolving Illusions About Vaccine Safety“
28 Wolfgang Wodarg: Falsche Pandemien, 2. Aufl. 2021, S. 314 ff.
Support “Ways Out Charity“! With your support, we can help and move forward. > https://bit.ly/3wuNgdO