by Dr.Harald Wiesendanger– Klartext
What the mainstream media is hiding
Updated: May 1, 2021
A crazy phrase characterizes an absurd health policy – and exposes it at the same time. Who will finally inform politicians and journalists that we still have an immune system even in the Corona crisis?
We are “defenseless” against the new coronavirus as long as there are no drugs and vaccines against it, explains Nobel Prize winner for medicine Markus Söder.
That is precisely how our so-called “quality media” see it. The ARD Tagesschau identifies Indigenous peoples as “defenseless,” ZDF “Heute,” and the Frankfurter Allgemeine identifies homeless peoples, Focus bus, and train passengers in New York. The Westdeutsche Allgemeine and the Tagespost see nurses as “defenseless” against Covid-19, and the Süddeutsche Zeitung and the Kölner Express see nursing home residents as “defenseless.” The Bayerischer Rundfunk pities “the poor population of Latin America” as “defenseless,” and RTL pities the textile workers in Bangladesh. The Frankfurter Rundschau believes that political prisoners in the Middle East are “defenselessly exposed” to the coronavirus, Spiegel believes that employees of the British National Health Service are exposed, and Deutschlandfunk believes that the Bosnian Roma are exposed. Welthungerhilfe is appalled by the “defenseless” exposure of children in overcrowded refugee camps on Greek islands, and the Bild newspaper and Diabetologie-online feel sorry for family doctors. For Austria’s news service OTS, employees in the security industry are “defenselessly exposed.” For the Abendblatt, “the corona pandemic shows what happens when we are defenselessly exposed to viruses”.
The fact that governments and journalists are using the same phrase with such unanimity can only be because they have all persistently skipped biology lessons – and are regulars in the same brainwashing parlor. How much stupidity qualifies one to hold a top political office? How can it be that someone, after spouting such blatant nonsense, is allowed to continue to govern unchallenged? How is it possible that a journalist who spreads something like this without comment does not have to vacate his editorial chair immediately?
Defenseless against the rain: This is the fate that befalls the nude bather who loses all his clothes and umbrella on a remote beach just before a thunderstorm sets in and cannot find shelter anywhere. Defenseless against a robber is a woman who is attacked by him on a lonely forest path, who left pepper spray and stun guns at home and did not attend a self-defense course. We are defenseless against a government that uses police force to impose disproportionate, unconstitutional epidemic protection on us – and, at the same time, prevents us from exercising fundamental democratic rights and taking to the streets to protest against it.
Under what circumstances would it be true to be “defenseless” against a pathogen? It would be one that would make us all sick and kill us as soon as we were infected with it. Whatever we did – there would be no escape.
Such a virus has so far only been seen in science fiction shockers such as “Contagion” and “Pandemic,” “Outbreak,” and “Carriers.” In the infectious reality of our planet, none has ever wreaked havoc. At most, it is currently lurking, genetically armed, in a high-security biological laboratory. Even the deadliest pathogens in human history were never 100% killers. Even Ebola and Hanta survive one in two infected people, 40 to 50% survive the plague. Only one in three dies of smallpox, one in five dies of Lassa virus, and 15 to 40% of West Nile fever. Even infection with the most murderous germ known, the Marburg virus, has no effect on one in ten people.
Measured against this, the lethality of SARS-CoV-2 appears ridiculously low: according to consistent studies from numerous countries, it is on average, 0.1 to 0.2%, i.e., in the range of severe influenza. Even among very elderly residents of old people’s homes and nursing homes, by far the most at-risk group, the vast majority do NOT fall victim to Covid-19: in China, 92% of 70- to 79-year-olds, 85% of those over 80. (1) In Spain, 79% of all infected people over 80 survived; in South Korea, 75%; in Switzerland, 73%; in the Netherlands and Italy, 67%. (2) Incidentally, this includes dozens of centenarians.
The fact alone THAT, on average, at least 99.7% of all infected people do NOT die from Covid-19 indicates that the protection that Söder raves about does not need to be developed. IT HAS BEEN EXISTING FOR A LONG TIME. Neither a pharmaceutical product nor a papal blessing can ensure this. The fact that it is more effective than a placebo does not need to be proven in controlled studies. No factories need to be built to produce it. No distribution network needs to be set up for it. There is no need to dispel massive concerns and resistance to it among large sections of the population. It does not need to be prescribed to patients. Health insurance companies do not need to spend a cent to provide us with it. There is no need for wickedly expensive controlled studies to find out in trial periods of a few weeks whether it is effective for longer than a few weeks – empirical medicine has known this for centuries. You don’t have to recruit a few hundred or a thousand test subjects – it has proven itself on billions of test subjects of all ages since time immemorial. Because almost all of us have this protection: our natural immunity.
If “immune system” were the name of an implant that could be patented, you can bet that the medical industry would have long since promoted it with the same marketing effort that it puts into vaccination campaigns. An army of business lobbyists and PR professionals would have long since worked to ensure that every inhabitant of this planet had one implanted as quickly as possible. Because it far outshines every known vaccine: It protects more people. It protects them more reliably. It protects them more tolerably. It protects them for longer. It protects them immediately, not after at least months of production. Against most pathogens, it has come into contact with for a lifetime.
Why we are supposedly “without protection” can be found in the “Bavarian Pandemic Framework Plan”. Although this document is devoted to the topic of influenza, it is apparently also used to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2. A pandemic, it says, “is caused by a NEW virus. Since this new pathogen has not previously occurred in the human population or has not occurred for a very long time, the immune system is NOT PREPARED. Humans are therefore NOT PROTECTED.”
Did immunologists and microbiologists come up with this nonsense? SARS-CoV-2 is not “new” but another variant of coronaviruses that biologists noticed under the electron microscope in the mid-1960s. The human immune system has long been exposed to this type of virus, like many others. It has always contributed to colds, flu infections, and respiratory diseases of all degrees of severity. Up to 60% of us already have a certain cellular background immunity to Covid-19 because of these contacts; the original assumption that we do not have such a thing has now been proven wrong.
IF SARS-CoV-2 were actually “novel” and out to live up to its reputation as a killer germ, then there might not be any German people left defenseless against its Berlin panic orchestra. They would have died out by the end of January at the latest – wiped out by a pandemic that would have completely infected them within weeks. There is increasing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was not only circulating in Europe from the end of January but already in late autumn. This is suggested by autopsies, subsequent examinations of computer tomography scans, and wastewater samples in several countries. (3)
So where did SARS-CoV-2 come from? Between October 6 and 11, there must have been a serious incident at Wuhan’s Institute of Virology (WIV). Telecommunications data indicate that the WIV was closed from October 7 to 24; not a single call was made from there during these two and a half weeks. Satellite images clearly show that from October 11, road traffic in the immediate vicinity of the WIV decreased significantly. Between October 14 and 19, it came to a complete standstill – an indication of road closures. Telemetry data show consistently high activity for the Wuhan Institute on all days in August and September and in the first week of October 2019 in a certain part of the building complex, which is probably a security area that all employees have to pass through. Between October 7 and 24, no one appears to have entered it. Why? (4) If the virus that triggered the greatest mass panic in history in 2020 had already escaped, then a major sporting event could have served as a “superspreader”: the Military World Games, which attracted almost 10,000 athletes from 110 countries and 230,000 volunteers in Wuhan from October 18 to 27, 2019. Several athletes had Covid-19 symptoms. Nobody took them particularly seriously. (5) Incidentally, the participants in the infamous “Event 201”, at which the Gates Foundation had top representatives from politics, business, and the media “simulate” the outbreak of a corona pandemic on October 18, 2019, may already have been aware that it was actually about controlling a REAL event; at least the head of the Chinese CDC, George Gao, who was present, was guaranteed to know about the events in Wuhan.
France’s first Covid-19 patient is now considered to be a 57-year-old who was admitted to the Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Colmar on December 2, 2019, with severe acute respiratory inflammation and was treated as an inpatient for about a week. (6) It is unlikely that the virus had inhibitions about jumping from Alsace across a common border several hundred kilometers long into Germany. What damage could the first German SARS-CoV-2 infected person have done in this country from the first week of December without being detected, with exponential, unchecked spread, with an initial doubling rate of 2 to 3 days? By the end of January, almost two months BEFORE the lockdown, Germany had probably become the ultimate “risk area,” with a 100% infected population.
There is only one reason why it did not come to that and why initial horror predictions of millions of deaths were embarrassingly wrong: the vast majority of us were already excellently protected thanks to a basic immunity that already existed. This quickly curbed the spread.
SARS-CoV-2 mutates, like all viruses. Because influenza viruses, among others, also manage to do this, we experience new waves of flu every year, against which previous vaccines fail. Nevertheless, we are by no means “defenseless” against them – if our body’s immune system is intact, they do not send most of us straight to the grave, but at most to bed for one or two weeks. Wouldn’t the 36 billion euros that the UN wants to collect for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be far more sensible invested in a global health program that teaches and motivates eight billion people, including Markus Söder, to strengthen their natural immunity – even if Big Pharma would not earn anything from it?
Harald Wiesendanger
Notes
(1) China CDC Weekly, zit. nach https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/medizin/neues-coronavirus-welche-menschen-durch-covid-2019-besonders-gefaehrdet-sind-a-261c0cf4-2ca3-4a42-a85b-d3dc546faa98
(2) KCDC/ISS/RIVM/ISCIII/BAG, zit. nach https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000117467672/altersverteilung-sterblichkeitsrate-und-weitere-internationale-zahlen-zu-covid-19; https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1114647/umfrage/letalitaetsrate-in-zusammenhang-mit-dem-coronavirus-in-italien-nach-alter/
(3) https://www.iss.it/en/primo-piano/-/asset_publisher/o4oGR9qmvUz9/content/id/5422725; https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/medizin/coronavirus-schon-im-dezember-in-abwaessern-von-turin-und-mailand-gefunden-a-56c600b2-1802-4d68-9197-3901e13694c7
(4) Siehe Harald Wiesendanger: Corona-Rätsel. Was steckt wirklich hinter dieser Pandemie? Wem nützt sie? Was bringt uns die nächste, Schönbrunn 2020, E-Book, S. 144 ff., https://suprcomstiftung-auswege-shop.mysupr.de/produkt/corona-raetsel/
(5) Siehe H. Wiesendanger: Corona-Rätsel, a.a.O., S. 143 f.
(6) „Coronavirus: un premier cas de Covid-19 remontant au 2 décembre confirmé en Alsace“, francetvinfo.fr, 7. Mai 2020, https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/maladie/coronavirus/coronavirus-un-premier-cas-de-covid-19-remontant-au-2-decembre-confirme-en-alsace